Nektere priznaky nasvedcuji ze USA nechteji odejit z Iraku NIKDY!
Od ted je to jejich AREA, kterou opusti jen Buh vi kdy!
Nasvedcuje tomu stavba nejvetsi ambasady na svete:
Bezne ma velvyslanestvi plochu kolem 10akru(čtyři hektary) Ale zastupitelství, které si Amerika momentálně buduje v Bagdádu,
bude velikosti Vatikánu a bude se rozkládat na ploše 104-akru(42 hektarů). !
Uzemi USA, ktere "prozatimni vlada" Iraku v rijnu r.2004 prodala USA!!! Podminky za jakych bylo prodano se nikdo nedozvi!
Buduje se Vatikan USA na Middle East- Vatikan predevsim nabozenstvi olejoveho!
Stale slysime od priznivcu valky v Iraku, ze nechceme? slyset dobre zpravy, ze Media presentuji jen zpravy spatne!
Vystavba tohoto monstra jako znaku permanentni pritomnosti
jako strazni vezi Americkych zajmu - a oleje !!!! na Strednim Vychode a je to rozhodne zprava dobra!
Ano, jak pro koho!
Jeste lepsia LIDSTEJSI by byla zprava, kdyby tento obri komplex prestal byt strazni vezi USA a stal se mistem pro tisice sirotku, jejich rodice jsme pozabijeli!
Of our neocon acquaintances and non-political friends we might ask: Can you read about this construction, look at the numbers involved, think of the homeless, disease-ridden people of Iraq, suffering from the highest unemployment of their lives and often having difficulty finding clean water, and then truly believe that the U.S. went to the Garden of Eden to help the Iraqi people?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
detailneji zde:
U.S. embassies typically cover ten acres. This one, a 104-acre complex, will be comprised of 21 buildings, its own water wells, an electricity plant and wastewaster-treatment facility that makes the huge compound completely independent of Iraq , whose "interim government" sold the land to the U.S. in October 2004. Terms of the agreement do not appear to be readily accessible.
In this case, the devil is less in the details than in the monumental size and cost of the endeavor. The likeness to a small fortified city is frightening to those who object to a permanent presence of the U.S. in Iraq, already destroyed by American bombs and depleted uranium, and the core of such fear lies in the question of WHY the U.S., already dangerously in debt back home and dangerously despised in Iraq and most of the mideast, is pounding its chest with such a noisy bravado. Is this the finale of "Shock and Awe"?
Those working in the embassy-city are protected by extraordinary security, overseen by U.S. Marines. Structures will be reinforced to 2.5 times the standard. There will be five high-security entrances as well as an emergency entrance/exit, according to a U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee report.
Foreign relations? Presumably the hope was at some point to look for olive branches, the U.S. and Iraq shaking hands and agreeing to go back to "go" and start all over. So from whom is such vast and expensive protection necessary? Were we ever within even shouting distance of being "liberators"? What kind of thinking would pour so much into a country that the White House says we want to turn over to the Iraqis as soon as possible? After all, we're the folks who brought "freedom" to Iraq . So why this elaborate expenditure at the same time that the people of the U.S. have finally awakened and turned against the invasion and occupation of a country that we now know never posed a threat to the U.S. or anyone else?
It's a hair past income tax time. Shouldn't those of us who filed have a word to say about where our checks are going? We've said, "No more. We want out as soon as possible." And yet the building goes on, about a third completed as of this writing.
Shall we take comfort in Mr. Bush's reassurances and hope he has a secret plan? Shall we look at the bright side and wonder how this impressive compound of compounds would work as an orphanage for the children whose parents we've blown to bits?
This is a notable expenditure. It costs as much as it does to bomb mud huts in the desert each week. We, the dwindling middle class, are paying for it, and paying through the teeth. And we're not paying sums like this for something that's meant to be temporary.
We are hearing from the war supporters that we don't hear the GOOD news, that the media presents only the BAD news. Thus, with this gargantuan but hush-hush project, we have to conclude that the construction of a permanent presence, an enormous watchtower over the entire mideast (and its oil) is the good news.
But it's quiet out there, a thick buffer between the people who now want this insanity to end and the sound of hammers and chain saws building walls, and more walls, and more. Surely to a once-proud Iraqi civilian, every wheelbarrow of mortar dragged across the new pavement that covers much of ancient Babylon is a symbol of unending loss.
----------------------------------------------------------------
vice o miste kam USA expanduji na dele nez docasne:
zde
|
||||||||
|
| Kalendář Příspěvků
Search
|
Americane navzdy v Iraku nebo jen "docasne" ?
by
ASTR
on Fri 21 Apr 2006 02:51 AM EDT | Permanent Link
Keywords:
astraus
Comments
Re: Americane navzdy v Iraku nebo jen "docasne" ?
No ta valka prece ma byt rychla. Jeste si pamatuji Jirikovi sliby. Nastane tan svoboda a lide si budou delat podle sveho.
Jiste pocitali s demoktacii Irackeho stylu a proto se stavi tak velka ambasada. Budou tam mit veky garaze aby se jim tam vesli limuziny vhodne do tamejsi krajiny. No jak je už osmatřicet let známo
by
jonáš
on Sat 22 Apr 2006 03:55 PM EDT | Profile | Permanent Link
je jednotkou dočasnosti jeden furt -- oni tam tu novou základnu prostě potřebujou. Jen jsem myslel že na kámoše Saudy zatlačej dřív, ale asi jim ten ďůlek jde budovat moc pomalu -- komplikace ;-)
Re: No jak je už osmatřicet let známo
On je rozdil mezi ambasadou a mamuti tvrzi.
To ukazuje, ze se nechystaji proste odejit a nechat Irak sobe vladnout. Na to by prece stacila obycejna abasada. aby generalove
by
ASTR
on Sun 30 Apr 2006 04:27 AM EDT | Profile | Permanent Link
nechteli sesadit Rumsfelda, komicky program doporucuje Bushovi, aby proste zadnemu generalovi nedovolil odejit do penze. Ve sluzbe budou drzet hubu a krok:-)
Saturday, April 29, 2006 Stephen Colbert kicks ass at White House press corps dinner Stephen Colbert's routine at last night's White House Press Corps dinner sounds like one of those perfect moments of comedy and commentary -- someone, find me a transcript! Colbert, who spoke in the guise of his talk show character, who ostensibly supports the president strongly, urged the Bush to ignore his low approval ratings, saying they were based on reality, "and reality has a well-known liberal bias." He attacked those in the press who claim that the shake-up at the White House was merely re-arranging the deck chairs on the Titanic. "This administration is soaring, not sinking," he said. "They are re-arranging the deck chairs--on the Hindenburg." Colbert told Bush he could end the problem of protests by retired generals by refusing to let them retire. He compared Bush to Rocky Balboa in the "Rocky" movies, always getting punched in the face--"and Apollo Creed is everything else in the world." Rone, Jerry!
by
vodnik
on Mon 01 May 2006 08:04 AM EDT | Profile | Permanent Link
Taky by se Vám tohle líbilo? :-))
Re: Rone, Jerry!
by
RON
on Mon 01 May 2006 11:27 AM EDT | Profile | Permanent Link
No kdyby v nem nasli po nejakem policejnim omylu tucet .38cek,to by se mne libilo nejvic:-))))))
|
Login
Poslední články
Utrecht hardcore (8)
Poslední Komentáře
Let's go Dutch! (jednorozec)
Re: Re: Re: Re: Utrecht hardcore (vodnik)
Re: Re: Re: Utrecht hardcore (jednorozec)
Re: Re: Utrecht hardcore (vodnik)
Re: Utrecht hardcore (jednorozec)
Re: Re: Utrecht hardcore (vodnik)
Re: Re: Utrecht hardcore (vodnik007)
Re: Utrecht hardcore (ASTR)
Odkazy
Osobní blogy
Badger's Hole
Politika
Antiwar.com
Věda|Technologie
|
||||||
|
||||||||